Blogger

投诉/举报!>>

Blog
more...
photo album
more...
video
more...
Home >> 1 Erotic stories>> Judging from the way she walk...

Add Favorites

cancel Favorites

Judging from the way she walks, she may have experienced sexual orgasm. 

"The goddess reveals herself by her gait" is a famous line by the ancient Roman poet Virgil, but I recently read it at the beginning of a 2008 paper that linked women's walking posture with vaginal orgasms[1]. If Virgil were alive, I wonder how he would comment on the researchers' use of his verses. In this paper, Nicholas et al. from the Institute of Family and Sex Education at KU Leuven (one of the top universities in Europe) claimed that trained sexologists could infer whether a woman had experienced a vaginal orgasm by observing her walking style. Although this is a relatively old study, it has been widely circulated on Weibo recently.


A simple experiment


was conducted by the researchers, who selected 20 female psychology students in Belgium as subjects through a questionnaire survey. This sample size was already somewhat small, but to make matters worse, on the day of the experiment, four of the girls stood up the researchers, so the final total number of participants was only 16. The experiment was divided into two groups. Seven participants claimed to frequently experience vaginal orgasms, with an average age of 21.5 years (±1.4 years). The remaining nine participants, who reported rarely experiencing vaginal orgasms, had an average age of approximately 20.8 years (±0.7 years). Both groups were unmarried and had never given birth.


The experiment was simple: participants were asked to walk 100 meters twice in a public place. In the first instance, researchers asked them to imagine themselves happily on a beach on a holiday. In the second instance, they were additionally asked to imagine walking on the beach with a man they loved beside them.


Of course, this was a trick by the researchers; what the women imagined was irrelevant to their true purpose. The difference in the imagined scenarios between the two walks was simply to prevent the participants from knowing the real experimental objective and to avoid human error. In reality, a camera recorded their every step, which was then used for subsequent analysis.


Now, it's time for our sexologist to step in. After obtaining the videotapes, two sexology professors and two research assistants, unaware of the participants' backgrounds, began scoring each woman's overall gait (focusing on pelvic and spinal rotation) and speculating on whether she had experienced vaginal orgasms (the crucial reasoning is still missing!). The researchers believed that women with smooth, energetic, and muscular gaits—in short, those who walked with a particularly "swaying" gait—were more likely to experience vaginal orgasms. According to their theory, these women were in better psychological and physical condition, which could be reflected in their gait. Interestingly


, the experts' predictions were remarkably consistent with the preliminary survey results: of the eight women the experts speculated had experienced vaginal orgasms, six were indeed among the seven in the first group. And of the nine participants who had not experienced vaginal orgasms, seven also failed to escape the experts' scrutiny. A perfect 13 out of 16 predictions—an 81.25% accuracy rate—and subsequent statistical analysis convinced the authors that this was not a result of mere guesswork. In other words, experts can infer whether a woman has experienced vaginal orgasm by observing her gait, and the accuracy rate is quite high.


Is this study reliable?


It can be seen from this paper that the author was very careful in designing the experiment, which greatly increased the objectivity of the experimental results. However, the discussion section at the end of the paper seems a bit hasty, and even has the suspicion of confirming for the sake of confirming. First of all, the sample size of this experiment is very small, with only 16 participants. If even one person makes a wrong prediction, it can change the final accuracy rate by 6.25%. If this study can recruit more participants and the experts can still achieve an accuracy rate of more than 80%, then this conclusion will be convincing.


Secondly, the researchers did not clearly define "vaginal orgasm". In the initial idea, the researchers wanted to distinguish between "vaginal orgasm" produced by sexual intercourse and "clitoral orgasm" produced by masturbation, but in reality, only a small percentage of women can achieve orgasm through vaginal intercourse alone [2]. Moreover, can the sensation produced by touching the clitoris during normal sexual intercourse be ignored? Who can guarantee that the clitoris will not be touched at all during the rush of entry and exit?


Third, the author doesn't seem to attribute the incorrect predictions from the experiment to their own theory, but instead unnecessarily makes an additional assumption: "These two misjudged women (referring to the two experimenters who claimed not to have experienced vaginal orgasms but were identified by experts as having, author's note) may have the ability to achieve vaginal orgasms, but simply lack sufficient experience." If you think the author only assumes this much, you're mistaken: "Or perhaps their previous boyfriends' physical condition wasn't sufficient to induce vaginal orgasms." Although phrased so euphemistically, reading this sentence still conjures up images of several strong, gorilla-like Belgian men being unfairly targeted.


In the past few days, Weibo posts related to walking and orgasms have been widely circulated, with numerous misunderstandings. Here, I'd like to kindly remind everyone that using this as a basis to determine someone's virginity is completely irrelevant. Furthermore, even assuming the research results are reliable, without the professional training mentioned in the article, ordinary people still cannot infer whether a woman has experienced vaginal orgasms based on her gait. If you confidently believe you've mastered the skill of reading gait for climaxes, only to discover that your partner, with whom you spend every day, doesn't walk with the expected "highs and lows," then you're somewhat humiliated.


Furthermore, Synge offers insightful perspectives on this research and provides some comments on this article. To learn more, please click: What to believe, what to doubt?

URL 1:https://www.sexlove5.com/htmlBlog/120084.html

URL 2:/Blog.aspx?id=120084&aspx=1

Previous Page : Hebei Dingzhou couple

Next Page : I am a single man, divorced for many years, seeking a suitable sexual partner, preferably from Baoding, Hebei province.

增加   

comment        Open a new window to view comments