[Humanity's Ice-Breaking Journey Towards an Era of Compassion]

1. A deep dive into couples' friendships: a groundbreaking journey towards an era of love. Saying goodbye to selfishness, possessiveness, and jealousy, and entering an era of love.
2. The essence of building a civilized society today is not to consolidate old morality, nor to completely break down moral constraints, but to advocate an enlightened moral outlook and establish a reasonable and progressive new-century morality.
3. Why are more men now accepting of their wives having extramarital affairs, and more inclined to share love with other women, rather than monopolizing their wives like an emperor? (Referring only to men with an open attitude towards sex)
1. Couples' friendships: a groundbreaking journey towards an era of love, bidding farewell to selfishness, possessiveness, and jealousy. An
enlightened attitude towards sex, and a critique of sexual constraints that restrict human freedom, resonate strongly in this era of human progress. This is mainly because it speaks out for people on physiological, humanistic, and practical levels, allowing the media to voice their concerns. Without public recognition, the voices of the general public would go unheard, leaving sexual issues as a persistent and unresolved burden.
It is suggested that we take this a step further, with a more far-sighted perspective, to see the profound historical significance of the open view of marriage that began with couples engaging in friendly relationships. This would allow society to theoretically accept new ideas and adapt to the times. That is, couples engaging
in friendly relationships should not only be understood and tacitly approved by society, but should be recognized and accepted. Offering understanding and sympathy from a humanistic perspective is a superficial level. At a deeper level, we should see that the open view of marriage, represented by couples engaging in friendly relationships, embodies a major advancement in the history of human civilization. Its significance is no less than the transition from matrilineal to patrilineal clans, because it represents a huge shift in humanistic perspective and cognition.
It is well known that human weaknesses include selfishness, possessiveness, and jealousy. And in this regard, sex is the most taboo. Good friends can share meals and hardships, but there is a proverb like "Better to wear a friend's clothes than touch a friend's wife." This shows that human selfishness is so stubborn, even in the face of deep friendship. However, in the 21st century, humanity is about to usher in a second Renaissance, with humanistic thought deeply ingrained in people's hearts. The transition from a barbaric era to a competitive era will inevitably lead to a warm and cooperative era—an era of love where people bid farewell to selfishness, possessiveness, and jealousy. The dissolution of "sexual repression" is a precise signal, and the open view of marriage, represented by couples engaging in casual relationships, is the beginning of a breakthrough in humanity's journey towards greater civilization.
2. Advocating an Enlightened Moral View
. Those who understand the positive significance of sexual freedom generally abhor the moral shackles imposed on people, even hating morality itself. They wish morality had never existed.
In fact, morality has its own important significance, so we, as open-minded people, should not completely obliterate morality, but rather question and explore what kind of morality is correct, in line with human nature, and reasonable.
An era devoid of morality will inevitably bring suffering to humanity. But an era ruled by erroneous moral views will bring even greater suffering to humanity, like the medieval Christian moral views, the Inquisition, where countless kind people and geniuses suffered unjust persecution.
Erroneous moral views have their own historical causes. However, establishing correct moral values should be the mission of enlightened contemporary people. Feudal, conservative, and outdated moral values must be eliminated. A modern, enlightened, and progressive moral value, advocated by these visionary and renowned intellectuals, should take root in people's hearts. This would be a blessing for the whole society and a legacy for future generations.
A loving, peaceful, mutually supportive, and shared humanistic atmosphere is a gift to the world.
The conservative "moralists'" restrictions on sex will not contribute to any moral progress; they will only incite rebellious psychology and increase sexual desire. But if communication is open, and sex is simply a normal, everyday matter—like eating—then people will not experience sexual repression or fantasies. Sexual behavior will be based on deep affection and will only occur among a minority, never leading to sexual promiscuity. Furthermore, promoting healthy views on sex will not increase the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases due to greater sexual freedom; rather, because everyone is open about this issue, diseases will actually decrease. Just as Yu the Great controlled the floods, the same applies to sexual issues. Openness will make sex a normal, ordinary thing, rather than something alluring.
3. Why do men today understand their wives' extramarital affairs and prefer to share one partner? (This question only applies to men with open attitudes towards sex.)
This question arose from a survey. Of course, the survey was conducted privately in an environment where people are open about sex, meaning it doesn't represent the views of the general public, but it is very representative of the views of men and women who are open about sex.
The survey results were as follows:
In the survey of men, the order of votes from highest to lowest among the four options was:
"Revelry," "Multiple partners sharing one partner," "One person having multiple partners," and "One-on-one relationships but frequently changing partners."
In the survey of women, the order of votes was:
"Revelry," and "One person having multiple partners." The other two options received almost no votes.
The "Revelry" option should be removed from the above results, because unrestrained sexual freedom is a natural resistance to sexual repression, and not necessarily people's true feelings.
The survey results for men raise the question that men (within this specific survey context, not society as a whole) are not, as one might imagine, most inclined to possess multiple women like an emperor. The most frequent and appealing option is the idea of "shared love for a woman" during sexual activity (not necessarily an action, as such an idea is difficult or impossible to realize in the current social environment). This idea surpasses the desire to monopolize multiple women or frequently change partners.
Similarly, men in this specific context are more willing to allow their wives to receive more attention and experiences with other men—allowing their wives to have lovers—and to accept that others share their love for their wives without jealousy of their wives dividing their love. Even though they understand that love is like sunshine, and that sharing it with others doesn't diminish one's own warmth, this open acceptance and the concept of sharing one's wife (note, not sharing a woman unrelated to oneself) is worthy of sociological study. The underlying reasons are undoubtedly profound, stemming from love for one's wife and possibly other progressive humanistic implications; therefore, it can only be raised as a question.

URL 1:https://www.sexlove5.com/htmlBlog/116775.html

URL 2:/Blog.aspx?id=116775&aspx=1

Previous Page : Repost: 23 Techniques for Female Ejaculation

Next Page : Sincerely seeking high-quality single men and couples from Hebei.

增加

comment Open a new window to view comments

Contact Information

[Humanity's Ice-Breaking Journey Towards an Era of Compassion]

comment Open a new window to view comments