Let's talk about 3P

Regarding the term "3P," Baidu Baike (Baidu Encyclopedia) is extremely secretive, refusing to mention it at all: some explain it as "three people," others as "three pigs," and still others even as "a three-pointer in basketball." Wikipedia, on the other hand, is direct, scientific, and objective, with its first explanation being "threesome sex": "In English, it's called Threesome (foursome is called Foursome), where two women and one man engage in sexual activity, also known as 'double penetration.' 3P stands for the English word 'Player,' meaning sexual activity involving three people simultaneously. The pattern can be two men and one woman, two women and one man, or three people of the same sex, with two men or two women possibly engaging in same-sex sexual activity."

Clearly, "3P" has become common knowledge, hence its unique manifestation in China is concealment, avoidance, and misrepresentation. I don't believe that if you say "I want to have a 3P with you" to a Chinese person nowadays, they will understand it as "I want to release three loud farts with you" (Baidu has such explanations). I only believe they will readily agree and conspire for something significant. Just as I believe everyone harbors a dream of threesomes, and I won't ask you "believe it or not." Regarding

the history and development of threesomes,

some online sources say that "influenced by Japanese pornography, threesomes gradually became a popular trend in Chinese society," a statement I disagree with. I still agree with Wikipedia's revelation: "This form of intercourse is not a recent development; polygamy created favorable conditions for threesomes. Furthermore, threesomes are also common in prostitution, keeping mistresses, or one-night stands." Going back several dynasties: Emperor Cheng of Han, Liu Ao, was extremely fond of "double penetration," and after having the Zhao Feiyan and Zhao Hede sisters, he often slept in the same bed with them, embracing them on both sides. Emperor Xiaowu of the Southern Song Dynasty, Liu Jun, did not avoid his mother, Empress Dowager Lu, during intercourse, indulging in debauchery in front of her, and even raped her. From then on, "the Emperor (Liu Jun) showed little respect in his boudoir, and when he had sexual relations with someone, he would sometimes keep them in the Empress Dowager's room" (from the *Book of Song*, *Biographies of Empresses and Consorts*). Emperor Shun of Yuan, Toghon Temür, practiced "dual cultivation" with his brother-in-law... From the corrupt Han, the decadent Tang, and the chaotic Ming dynasties, from imperial families to ordinary alleys, threesomes were commonplace, not worth mentioning. I also believe that China has a huge market population. For example, the recent scandalous photos of Kunming officials—according to an editor with 10 years of experience in film and advertising—"The three people sitting on the bed all stared directly at the other person lying on the bed, their expressions rich and extremely natural, their eyes and expressions showing a high degree of tacit understanding." This shows they have practiced repeatedly for a long time and are well-versed in the essence of threesomes.

Some say that the Chinese workplace is the art of the dinner table. Who you eat with every day requires careful consideration and planning. If you do it well, you can ride the wave of promotion; if you do it poorly, you'll be sidelined or sent to a remote post. And friendships at the dinner table are still somewhat superficial. After all, a dinner party involves at least a few people and sometimes more than a dozen. To develop a truly close relationship is clearly not deep enough. Therefore, there is a folk song that says: to have a truly close relationship, you either need to be comrades-in-arms or lovers with benefits.

This scenario, in our younger minds, usually conjured up this image: a subordinate sitting outside, silently smoking, listening to their boss inside with their mistress or even their wife, the bed creaking and groaning, fantasizing about a bright future. Now, thinking about it, wouldn't a threesome with your boss, a joint effort, be even more effective? Working in the same company, dining at the same table, nothing beats sharing a bed. After all, working together makes you colleagues, eating together makes you comrades, and "fighting" together makes you kindred spirits, or even brothers-in-law. So, having the chance to have a threesome with a colleague or comrade means you're incredibly close, and could become a trusted confidant.

Of course, a threesome isn't a guaranteed win-win situation; nothing in this world is perfect. Sex is like war; since it's a threesome, you have to master the timing and acting. Just like playing cards with your boss, you can't always win, or you're asking for trouble. Of course, you can't lose too blatantly, obviously throwing the game to curry favor. If the boss isn't satisfied, he'll naturally dislike you. The key is to let the boss have his fun while you lose just right. This principle applies to threesomes as well, but it's even more subtle in practice.

Having previously worked in the media, I heard rumors that a certain boss often had some semi-famous models and actresses he wanted to sexually exploit to advance their careers. This self-proclaimed highly capable man boasted that he would show one of his subordinates something, and thus summoned a woman willing to engage in a threesome. Once the action began, the boss and the woman were uninhibited, while the subordinate was quite shy and reserved. After the night, the boss and the woman felt he was just a spectator and lacked ability. Although he remained working for the boss afterward, he was clearly looked down upon and never given any important responsibilities. Meanwhile, this same boss's threesome with another man had a completely different ending. This man and his superior enjoyed a passionate encounter with a woman, but as time went on, the superior, being older and less energetic, eventually gave in. The man, however, became increasingly vigorous, monopolizing her body, which aroused the superior's jealousy. As a result, the superior gradually distanced himself from him and lost his favor. Furthermore, male threesomes have a major flaw: they easily trigger negative effects. For example, in a threesome, women can observe each other's breasts and offer mutual evaluations; however, in a male threesome, size is taboo, especially when the man is smaller than the woman, making it even more awkward.

Therefore, to successfully flatter someone in a threesome, one must be short, soft, and praise the superior's abilities. This can be extrapolated to the workplace. In the modern workplace, if the superior is incompetent and you are capable, you're doomed. In this way, the superior is always wise, and subordinates all pretend to be foolish and cowardly. This perpetuates the rigid hierarchical system of ruler-subject, father-son, and husband-wife relationships, naturally leading to a scarcity of young talents and low-level employees. After all, good talent comes from the forest, and talent comes from humble beginnings. The issue of threesomes reveals a larger truth: it's no wonder that today's companies promote new employees through either hereditary succession by the boss's children or the rise of those who are weak, incompetent, and obsequious. Consequently, companies lack fresh blood and capable leaders, hindering research, innovation, and industrial upgrading. Looking

ahead, if we adopt a more open-minded

perspective, this once feudalistic practice might become a symbol of a new society. The reason is simple: threesomes are not a male prerogative, but rather a "devil" lurking in everyone's heart. The desire for novelty and excitement is inherent in human nature. It's even said that couples engaging in threesomes with a third party can benefit family harmony and stability, a result of mutual understanding and respect between loving couples. Feminism could also use this to humiliate men, letting their partners know they are more interested in women's bodies. Threesomes might even become a new sporting event… a scenario that respects human rights and promotes fairness.

Alternatively: Forcing everyone to forbid threesomes will inevitably lead to someone saying, "I'll die if I don't." They'll then accept the punishment. Many people dare not violate the explicit agreement, so they don't participate, and over time, they get used to it. This is also a fair and beautiful situation.

The worst situation is the third one: neither supporting nor opposing private threesomes, nor supervising or investigating officials' threesomes. Once exposed, one person is blamed. I feel sorry for that person: he has been in officialdom for a long time and no longer realizes his mistake. Many people know about his affairs, so why didn't anyone stop or resist him? He must think that threesomes are consensual, or even something that everyone likes. The underground affairs are suddenly brought to the surface like an absurd play, from which one can see the whole picture. The anger that arouses the public is not the resistance to threesomes, but the anger at injustice. It's not the scarcity that's the problem, but the inequality; it's not their own threesomes that's the problem, but the lack of access for ordinary people to threesomes. If the higher-ups cannot eradicate the problem internally, how can they educate the people? If this continues, threesomes will become a luxury and a symbol of the powerful, creating a very unfair and unpleasant situation.

How innocent are the threesomes! In fact, I agree with the statement: "Everyone has the right to seek more than one intimate partner, to release stress and fill the gaps in their individual private spaces by living with more than one partner." Honestly, having this need is perfectly normal. Just as some people are born attracted to the same sex, some enjoy unusual foods, and some remain unmarried for life—these are all personal freedoms. I believe that as long as it doesn't harm others and the consequences are acceptable, this personal choice should not be explicitly suppressed. What's difficult to ascertain is whether the participants in a threesome felt hurt, or even coerced. And whether they can truly bear the consequences afterward.

In reality, many people are like the man who professed to love dragons but was terrified of them. Who hasn't thought about arson, robbery, getting something for nothing, or committing evil deeds? But when it comes to actually doing such things, most rational people with self-control restrain themselves. Besides legal constraints, there's also the matter of self-moral judgment. Take Kubrick's film *Eyes Wide Shut*, for example. The initially loving couple believed that mutual honesty and even attending "swapping" parties would enhance their relationship. However, they didn't realize they weren't as open-minded as they thought, and their resentment ultimately led to their separation. It's said that Tom Cruise and Nick Fury divorced after filming this movie, demonstrating that human nature is far more complex and difficult to control than we imagine. If you're not confident in handling the psychological consequences of a threesome, can't guarantee you won't hurt others, and can't bear the social backlash if it's exposed; if you haven't even carefully considered these possibilities and concerns, I suggest you abandon your threesome dream.
In fact, any sexual activity involving adults, in a private and voluntary manner, without any victim, cannot be blamed. Everyone has the right to seek more than one intimate partner, and to release stress and fill their respective private spaces by living with more than one intimate partner.

URL 1:https://www.sexlove5.com/htmlBlog/116340.html

URL 2:/Blog.aspx?id=116340&aspx=1

Previous Page : How do you play 3P?

Next Page : The Beginning of Developing a Conservative Guangdong Wife

增加

comment Open a new window to view comments

Contact Information

Let's talk about 3P

comment Open a new window to view comments