配合一下

2021-04-04 06:08:37

Don’t forget your original intention.

追求刺激的人

2021-04-07 10:07:09

Well written

wori_22

2021-04-07 10:18:36

Yes, the body can be shared, but the heart can only belong to one another.

盘古来了

2021-04-07 11:05:32

The original poster is an elder and deserves respect. However, touching me, kissing me, entering my body, making me feel like I'm flying in heaven, and not feeling grateful to him, not longing for him, not liking him—unless I'm an animal. Mutual affection is essential for enjoyment; this is a shared view between my husband and me.

yeceng

2021-04-07 11:11:03

Sex and love are one thing, yet two things. Completely separating them is truly difficult.

冻龄夫妻

2021-04-07 16:05:04

@Pangu is here. True love means future responsibilities and obligations, so values must be aligned as much as possible; sex is fine as long as there is mutual affection and liking; can I understand the former as a property that requires a larger investment, while the latter is a rental that can be changed frequently?

冻龄夫妻

2021-04-07 16:49:52

The "love" in sex is just a liking; liking alone is not enough to generate the love that can build a marriage and family. The "love" in the separation of sex and love refers to the full love between husband and wife. The two are not the same concept.

盘古来了

2021-04-08 00:05:01

@Ageless Couple, Oh! Your views differ from mine. Marital love is what you call liking plus dependence, not responsibility plus obligation as you mentioned. Humanity has existed for 3.5 million years, while private ownership has only existed for 3,500 years, about one-thousandth. In the future, with abundant material production, whatever we need will be easily obtained. Will private ownership still have any meaning? Family, marriage, etc., will become superfluous. Let's say another 3,500 years at the rate of development, and private ownership will reach its end. 7,000 years seems like a long time. The Earth has existed for 4 billion years; another 400 million years shouldn't be a problem. Think about it, 7,000 years is negligible compared to 400 million years. Private ownership, family, marriage—these things go against human nature; they are dispensable in the long river of human history. Let me tell you, you might not believe it, but when shamans and tribal chiefs began to monopolize women, they were considered criminals by the people. To atone for their sins, they had to send their wives to public places around the third day of the third lunar month each year for everyone to enjoy. The wives often returned home severely injured, but these powerful figures always found a way. They paid people to replace them, the so-called temple dancers. A hundred years ago, nuns in Tibetan temples were bought by wealthy people and placed there for public amusement. Think about it, without family, spouse, where do responsibility and obligation come from? It's like what you said before: true love is simply dependence based on liking.

冻龄夫妻

2021-04-08 02:22:42

@PanguIsHere Family responsibility and spousal obligations are precisely the institutional guarantees of mutual affection and interdependence, which is the biggest difference from sexual partners, and therefore the feelings generated will be very different; the world today is not a primitive communist society, nor a utopian society, nor is it 3500 years from now. Human nature is still selfish and greedy. If you use the unrealistic thinking of time travel to judge and practice the current reality, then I can only be speechless...

盘古来了

2021-04-08 10:02:47

@Ageless Couple, it seems you're really angry. Let's talk again once you've calmed down.

zms1844

2021-05-01 23:20:05

The body can be shared, but the heart can only be kept private.

盘古来了

2021-05-04 00:51:56

@Ageless Couple, the Communist Party nurtured a great scholar named Ai Siqi, who authored the book "Dialectical Materialism and Historical Materialism," which was once a textbook for our parents' generation. He taught us not to view things statically. What is true today may be false tomorrow. For example, theft must be punished—this is a truth today. However, society develops rapidly, and one day, products will outnumber social needs, and people will have whatever they want. At that point, will the principle of punishing theft still be true? In a few years, people will view theft as magic; then, they will consider it a skill and send their children to learn it! This is what Engels said in "Anti-Dühring."

冻龄夫妻

2021-05-04 08:56:39

@PanguIsHere Neither conservatism nor radicalism is desirable; only by remaining true to the fundamental principles amidst change can one truly keep pace with the times and stay true to one's original aspirations. Today's truths must be accepted and followed until tomorrow's practice fully proves them false—that's enough! If they could be easily overturned based solely on subjective speculation like "maybe," then truth would forever lose its practical significance and objective value in any time and space. I read the two books you mentioned years ago, and I have had considerable direct and indirect experience with them… If you're interested, you can read the "Dystopian Trilogy"—"We," "1984," and "Brave New World"—it will greatly change your worldview. Everyone can have ideals in life, and it's also acceptable to have a bit of fantasy, but absolutely no unrealistic daydreaming. Too much daydreaming will lead to a split personality. I hope you can understand my good advice positively; otherwise, you can simply laugh it off.

c2c

2022-04-15 16:57:45

Wandering around

c2c

2022-04-15 16:58:13

Will they eventually become homeless?

盘古来了

2022-05-11 10:49:26

@c2c, it's not that people are homeless, it's that they don't need a home. Just like how people today have become accustomed to free love and consider it a matter of course, unaware that 100 years ago, free love was considered heretical. For girls, free love was seen as mere romantic flings, wanting men to have sex with them—shameful! Don't believe it? Sun Yat-sen, Chiang Kai-shek, Mao Zedong, Li Dazhao, Chen Duxiu, Lu Xun, Hu Shi, Lin Biao, and many others all had arranged marriages. They were among the most enlightened people of their time. Clearly, humanity originally didn't have the concept of family; it's a byproduct of private ownership. As productivity developed and material wealth increased, private ownership disappeared, and naturally, the family disappeared as well.