Is it possible for a woman to marry two husbands?

page views:1 Publication date:2013-03-21

I finished watching the movie "My Wife Wants to Remarry" at 1 a.m. I was very sleepy, but a few questions kept nagging at me: 　　1. Is betrayal a preservative for love? 　　2. As a woman, how could she convince two men to accept her seemingly absurd ideas? Was it simply because they loved her? 　　3. The ending shocked me so much! The lie wasn't exposed and continued to thrive under the bright sunlight. What are the chances of such a story existing in reality? 　　Regarding the first question: 　　The female lead in the movie is the wife of two men and the daughter-in-law of two families, working tirelessly and flawlessly, handling all the household chores. Before marriage, her view on love was: If you love me, love all of me. Even if I sleep with another man, I will only love you more. 　　The man asks: Why divide your love in half? 　　The woman answers: No, it just doubles the love. 　The guilt brought by betrayal can bring more tolerance and patience, but is that really still love? If in the past, men would show remorse to their wives after betraying them, nowadays, even those who feel remorse are few and far between. And women, after retaliatory infidelity, how many can truly return to their families with a calm heart? 　　Their hearts may be filled with turmoil, but when it comes to betrayal and infidelity, the chances for men and women are gradually converging, even to the point of tacit acceptance in some families. Does marriage really need this kind of tacit acceptance to withstand the stagnation that follows the loss of passion? 　　I can understand that loving two people simultaneously is indeed possible. But to know everything and still tacitly accept sharing one's wife with another man—this cannot be explained simply by loving without boundaries. Even more perplexing is that from the beginning, she had no intention of hiding anything from anyone; openly and persistently, she captured the hearts of two men. 　　

The second question
concerns why they accepted it.
At the end, when Man 1 and Man 2 met, Man 2 said, "The child is yours. We've been using contraception, and we each eat our own food. But I just love her the way she is." These words betrayed his deep sadness. Man 1, upon hearing this, was instantly lifted from the depths of despair. He had finally obtained the proof he had always longed for, and thus forgave the whole world, all of humanity.
With a potential rival present, these two men could still rationally compete, comparing their work, their bedroom skills, and their love. They didn't go mad; they gradually accepted this lifestyle, even acknowledging that marriage under this system was indeed more passionate, even improving the quality of their sex life.
A woman whose rationality surpassed that of men completely conquered two men, making them readily believe in her views on love. This powerful brainwashing ability, I believe, is only possible if the male-to-female ratio becomes completely unbalanced, with men outnumbering women by several times. 　　In fact, if men were born into such a system, they would genuinely accept it. See, matriarchal societies, walking marriage systems—those men didn't go mad either. 　　The third question. 　　Finally, Man 1 was prepared to burn his bridges. He stormed into their baby's one-month celebration, clutching evidence, and shouted, "This is my wife! This is my child!" 　　I thought that was the end of it. Unexpectedly, on the sports field, the two men reconciled, and the second man actually saved the first man from his persistent imbalance. 　　Please allow me to admire the queen played by Son Ye-jin. 　　You firmly believe in a faith and successfully inspire those around you to share it. This possibility isn't nonexistent. 　　But what woman can withstand such turmoil? Is there any woman who can remain righteous amidst such conflict? 　　I can't imagine. I can't imagine anyone doing it. 　　Although in reality, some men use their MBA knowledge to manage their mistresses. And in ancient times, empresses were those who managed their teams with wisdom. But today is neither a matriarchal society nor a feminist society. 　　It's said this film was incredibly popular in South Korea. I don't believe that a story like this could happen between people with similar educational backgrounds and social classes. But I do know that women's attitudes towards marriage and love have indeed changed. Those promises, those beliefs, and those beautiful dreams all remained in the summer when I was 17. 　　

I finished watching the movie "My Wife Wants to Remarry" at 1 a.m. I was very sleepy, but a few questions kept nagging at me: 　　1. Is betrayal a preservative for love? 　　2. As a woman, how could she convince two men to accept her seemingly absurd ideas? Was it simply because they loved her? 　　3. The ending shocked me so much! The lie wasn't exposed and continued to thrive under the bright sunlight. What are the chances of such a story existing in reality? 　　Regarding the first question: 　　The female lead in the movie is the wife of two men and the daughter-in-law of two families, working tirelessly and flawlessly, handling all the household chores. Before marriage, her view on love was: If you love me, love all of me. Even if I sleep with another man, I will only love you more. 　　The man asks: Why divide your love in half? 　　The woman answers: No, it just doubles the love. 　The guilt brought by betrayal can bring more tolerance and patience, but is that really still love? If in the past, men would show remorse to their wives after betraying them, nowadays, even those who feel remorse are few and far between. And women, after retaliatory infidelity, how many can truly return to their families with a calm heart? 　　Their hearts may be filled with turmoil, but when it comes to betrayal and infidelity, the chances for men and women are gradually converging, even to the point of tacit acceptance in some families. Does marriage really need this kind of tacit acceptance to withstand the stagnation that follows the loss of passion? 　　I can understand that loving two people simultaneously is indeed possible. But to know everything and still tacitly accept sharing one's wife with another man—this cannot be explained simply by loving without boundaries. Even more perplexing is that from the beginning, she had no intention of hiding anything from anyone; openly and persistently, she captured the hearts of two men. 　　

The second question
concerns why they accepted it.
At the end, when Man 1 and Man 2 met, Man 2 said, "The child is yours. We've been using contraception, and we each eat our own food. But I just love her the way she is." These words betrayed his deep sadness. Man 1, upon hearing this, was instantly lifted from the depths of despair. He had finally obtained the proof he had always longed for, and thus forgave the whole world, all of humanity.
With a potential rival present, these two men could still rationally compete, comparing their work, their bedroom skills, and their love. They didn't go mad; they gradually accepted this lifestyle, even acknowledging that marriage under this system was indeed more passionate, even improving the quality of their sex life.
A woman whose rationality surpassed that of men completely conquered two men, making them readily believe in her views on love. This powerful brainwashing ability, I believe, is only possible if the male-to-female ratio becomes completely unbalanced, with men outnumbering women by several times. 　　In fact, if men were born into such a system, they would genuinely accept it. See, matriarchal societies, walking marriage systems—those men didn't go mad either. 　　The third question. 　　Finally, Man 1 was prepared to burn his bridges. He stormed into their baby's one-month celebration, clutching evidence, and shouted, "This is my wife! This is my child!" 　　I thought that was the end of it. Unexpectedly, on the sports field, the two men reconciled, and the second man actually saved the first man from his persistent imbalance. 　　Please allow me to admire the queen played by Son Ye-jin. 　　You firmly believe in a faith and successfully inspire those around you to share it. This possibility isn't nonexistent. 　　But what woman can withstand such turmoil? Is there any woman who can remain righteous amidst such conflict? 　　I can't imagine. I can't imagine anyone doing it. 　　Although in reality, some men use their MBA knowledge to manage their mistresses. And in ancient times, empresses were those who managed their teams with wisdom. But today is neither a matriarchal society nor a feminist society. 　　It's said this film was incredibly popular in South Korea. I don't believe that a story like this could happen between people with similar educational backgrounds and social classes. But I do know that women's attitudes towards marriage and love have indeed changed. Those promises, those beliefs, and those beautiful dreams all remained in the summer when I was 17. 　　

URL 1:https://www.sexlove5.com/htmlBlog/60928.html

URL 2:/Blog.aspx?id=60928&aspx=1

Last access time:

Previous Page : My first and second 3P

Next Page : How I came to like threesomes (Part 2)

增加

comment Open a new window to view comments

Contact Information

Is it possible for a woman to marry two husbands?

comment Open a new window to view comments