Blogger

投诉/举报!>>

Blog
more...
photo album
more...
video
more...
Home >> 1 Erotic stories>> Why would anyone accept a ***...
Blogger:lzglzg227 2016-03-24

Add Favorites

cancel Favorites

Why would anyone accept a *** game? 

    page views:1  Publication date:2016-03-24  
Hearing about such things is truly incomprehensible. How can anyone allow their spouse to have sex with another person? Even more incomprehensible is how these people can accept such a thing? Watching their spouse have sex with someone else, and then being "sexed" by someone else themselves—can this experience truly be accepted by themselves and society?
Note: "Partner swapping" specifically refers to exchanging sexual partners, that is, married couples exchanging sexual partners. Exchanging partners between boyfriends and girlfriends who are not married is not a legal issue of partner swapping, but a moral issue of relationships between men and women outside of marriage. What is partner swapping?
It 's certain that this preference is not rare, and it's not limited to men. Some female netizens have consulted about enjoying having their husbands purchase sexual services while they watch—something they find exciting and pleasurable. The editor wants to say that there's nothing wrong with this; it's a personal sexual preference. Everyone has their own unique sexual preferences, and as long as it doesn't harm others, their sexual rights should be respected. Regarding the issue of partner swapping, Li Yinhe stated in her blog that partner swapping is a recreational activity or lifestyle voluntarily chosen by a minority of adults. It does not violate the three principles of sexology (voluntariness, privacy, and between adults), and it is a legitimate right of citizens. In the 1970s, a large number of people in the United States participated in partner swapping, reaching 2-3% of all couples, without harming society. A minority violating the values of the majority does not necessarily harm society; it violates monistic values, not pluralistic values. Minors should not be punished for harming society, because although they are a minority, they are human beings, citizens, and have the right to choose behaviors that do not harm others. Their rights should be protected. Why can't the public accept partner swapping? The public finds it difficult to accept partner swapping simply because our social culture advocates monogamous romantic love, while partner swapping, to some extent, infringes on a partner's right to possess the other's body. Similarly, the idea that "love is exclusive and can only be one-on-one" stems from a partner's possession of the other's body and mind. Therefore, especially in our country's culture, there are very strong taboos regarding third parties and sexual infidelity. Any challenge to monogamy and one-on-one romantic love will become a target of public criticism. In reality, instead of simply condemning those who engage in partner swapping, we should reflect on our marriage system itself. The world is inherently diverse. Some people find lifelong monogamous sexual relationships romantic and interesting, while others prefer multiple sexual relationships for their own excitement. This is a difference in personal views on sexuality, and there is no inherent superiority or inferiority. When placed within the framework of marriage, partner swapping may seem to violate the marital contract, but this is only the surface. The key issue is that one-on-one marriage is not suitable for everyone. Our society and culture advocate one-on-one marriage, but this is clearly unsuitable for those who engage in partner swapping. It is precisely because of the dominance of monogamy that they are forced into such marriages. To some extent, they become enforcers of the marriage system due to pressure from authority, unlike those who actively choose monogamous marriage. Therefore, when we make judgments, can we sensitively recognize the oppression and power dynamics inherent in the sexual system? Many opponents argue that it undermines the family system and harms society, raising concerns about its social impact and order. However, research suggests that partner swapping does not threaten the institution of marriage; this "compromise" allows both partners to achieve a degree of honesty and trust. In Fang Gang's book, *Partner Swappers: A Study of Intimate Relationships*, many interviewees reported that partner swapping positively impacted their marriages, leading to greater intimacy and even improved understanding through discussion. After practicing partner swapping, Xiao Liu and his wife's relationship improved significantly. Xiao Liu said, "We used to argue frequently, but now we only argue once or twice a year." Their trust also increased dramatically. Xiao Liu said, "If my wife doesn't tell me something, she must have her reasons." Even sexual infidelity, usually considered a major secret between couples, became public, so there was truly nothing to worry about. Mr. Su and his wife were still discussing cohabitation when interviewed, but this discussion itself had deepened their relationship: "I feel that discussing cohabitation, imagining it, and even putting it into practice, is irreplaceable in maintaining our passion and managing negative emotions." This is understandable, as the discussion itself is a process of jointly overcoming taboos, and usually a process of expressing love and emotional loyalty. Compared to the controversy surrounding partner swapping, what's more absurd is that such private sexual activities are charged with "group sex." This shows that sexual rights are not well recognized in China, and individual sexual autonomy is being violated. Article 301 of the Criminal Law stipulates that those who organize or repeatedly participate in group sex activities shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years, criminal detention, or public surveillance. In conclusion, individuals have the right to choose for themselves, and the law should not interfere excessively as long as it does not harm others. Morally, this harmless individual uniqueness should also be respected, and it should not be judged by a single moral standard.

URL 1:https://www.sexlove5.com/htmlBlog/50089.html

URL 2:/Blog.aspx?id=50089&aspx=1

Last access time:

Previous Page : A Guide to Self-Cultivation for a High-Quality Single Man (Part 1) -- Original by Shi Tou

Next Page : Five Reasons Women Participate in Couples' Online Friendships

增加   

comment        Open a new window to view comments