An increasingly realistic society

page views:1 Publication date:2012-11-01

Increasingly realistic views on marriage often lead to women saying that men without a house and car have no right to pursue them, while men often say that modern women are materialistic and don't know whether they marry for money or for a person. In reality, these are only a small minority, but because they are a small minority, they are magnified and used as typical examples. Those women who only want a man's house and car do indeed want to marry for money, while those men who say women only care about their wallets don't really understand women. I recently saw a survey about what women value most in relationships. 45.7% of men believed that women value a man's money most, but in reality, only 19.1% of women chose money. A high 40.6% chose love, followed by friendship (11.5%), then security, sex, personality, and appearance. From this survey, it's easy to see the different views on love between men and women. Men often criticize women for being too materialistic, but in fact, men themselves are the most materialistic. Of course, the choice between love and money changes with age. Younger women often believe that love is enough; in their minds, love is paramount, the foundation of their happiness and joy. However, as they grow older, they realize that love alone is not enough. Just like the difference between love and marriage, love can be romantic and carefree, but marriage requires the realities of daily life. Therefore, women in this age group may consider money more important. As they get older and reach middle age, with stable family and career, they pay more attention to quality of life, and sex becomes a more important aspect. Someone on the forum said that those with a monthly income below 5,000 are considered lower class, which angered many men, who retaliated, feeling that such women were truly outrageous. I think there's no need for that. People have their own opinions, but the most important thing is not to belittle oneself. Some people can be extremely wealthy but not necessarily happy, while others can be penniless but without burdens. Just like women choosing between love and money, those who value feelings will prioritize love, while those who prioritize profit will be willing to inflate their own value. Whether it's love or money, I believe it's a matter of mutual consent; both men and women are inherently giving and receiving, and no one can force the other. A smart woman will value a man's character and morality. A man can be poor, but he cannot lack ambition; a man can be without a house, but he cannot lack the desire to buy one. I think a man should have the desire to provide a better life for his woman; a house, a car—everything is within his reach. Women are often emotional, and therefore, love often influences their choices. Those women who claim they won't marry a man without a house or car simply haven't met a man worthy of their love, a man they would follow without hesitation. Without love, they certainly have reason to strive for more material comforts. Men often say, "A woman's heart is like a needle at the bottom of the sea," but men who say this don't understand women's hearts at all. Women are actually very simple; living with a man they love is every woman's desire. This society is just too realistic. Love is the hardest thing to grasp. Men are calling for the legalization of keeping mistresses and prostitution; they're always looking for the most reasonable outlet for their desires. So why should women be faithful to men? Throughout history, how many men have abandoned their wives after becoming wealthy? Too many facts have made women distrust men, so they feel money is more trustworthy than men. Therefore, men shouldn't blame women for being too realistic; it's because men themselves are too untrustworthy. So men shouldn't always blame women for being too realistic; they should think about what makes women realistic. If a man is charming and trustworthy, a woman will love him too much to care about such things. A charming man isn't necessarily handsome or rich, but he knows how to live and how to love a woman. So when men criticize women for being too realistic and materialistic, it's actually a reflection of their own insecurity. They feel women have hurt their self-esteem, that women love their money, not them as men. They don't understand that money is only one part of a man's charm, not the whole thing. If a woman only loves your money and not you as a person, I advise you to give her up as soon as possible. Just like a man who only loves a woman's appearance but doesn't care about her inner qualities, such love is flawed and won't last.

URL 1:https://www.sexlove5.com/htmlBlog/131277.html

URL 2:/Blog.aspx?id=131277&aspx=1

Last access time:

Previous Page : Shenzhen couples dating

Next Page : Single men in Dongguan sincerely seeking partners from Dongguan.