Blogger

投诉/举报!>>

Blog
more...
photo album
more...
video
more...
Home >> 1 Erotic stories>> The bold theories of a post-8...

Add Favorites

cancel Favorites

The bold theories of a post-80s girl about *** games 

    page views:1  Publication date:2016-06-08  
I happened to chat with a colleague about prostitution. She was born in 1983, is unmarried, and is the kind of girl with a very strong personality and many ideas. Regarding prostitution, she supports Li Yinhe's viewpoint. Prostitution meets human needs, has legality and rationality, is entirely a personal choice, or rather, a choice of a small group or marginalized group, and does not harm others. Based on the above reasons, prostitution has no moral issues. What would relationship expert Su Qin say about her viewpoint?
Prostitution is forward-thinking, avoiding one-night stands and extramarital affairs.
Let's call my colleague L.
Here, I raise a question. The fundamental principle of marriage is fidelity. Prostitution violates the principle of fidelity, and like one-night stands and extramarital affairs, it is a desecration of marriage.
As a result, L said that prostitution does not violate fidelity, and prostitution is different from one-night stands and extramarital affairs. One-night stands and extramarital affairs are based on deception and concealment, while prostitution is fair, transparent, and consensual. We must face up to human desires; they exist, and prostitution is the most direct and effective way to avoid one-night stands and extramarital affairs.
In addition, L also raised an interesting point of view. She said that the development of social morality sometimes lags significantly behind, and the existence of homosexuality has a certain foresight. Just like homosexuality, it has always been rejected, but more and more countries recognize it as legal, reasonable, and justifiable, and grant it rights through law.
Ms. L expressed doubt about social morality, believing that social moral norms are a vague concept; no one can clearly define what social morality is, and no one can represent social morality, only themselves. What they don't understand isn't necessarily wrong or immoral. Existence is its own justification, and truth often lies in the hands of a minority.
It must be admitted that Ms. L's thinking is very rigorous, without logical flaws. I really can't define what social moral norms are; it is indeed very vague. You might say respecting the elderly and caring for the young is a universally accepted social moral norm, but to what extent does it meet the social moral standard? Moreover, there are so many special circumstances that it's impossible to determine exactly what the social moral standard is.
Law is extracted from those defined moral standards and then quantified into articles. I believe that in social development, morality comes first, then law. With the development of a society governed by law, all established moral standards are legalized, leaving only uncertain gray areas. What's in people's hearts cannot be constrained by law, and moral standards are so vague, it's truly impossible to control them.
Therefore, I can only vaguely say that social morality is the understanding and perception of morality held by the majority of people in society—a comprehensive indicator of the conscience of the majority. Undoubtedly, adultery violates this indicator, so it's perfectly normal for adultery to be rejected by the public. Furthermore, even if adultery doesn't violate fidelity, it still harms the love, or rather, the feelings, between the two parties in the marriage. Because it's very difficult for two people who love each other to accept that their partner has sexual relations with another person or several other people.
Adultery can satisfy undeniable physiological needs .
Guess what L said?
L said, "You're so unrealistic! Do you think modern marriage is based on love, or what you call feelings? In today's society, how many marriages are based on love and feelings? Most marriages are maintained because of responsibility, habit, property, and children?"
Even if you're right that masturbation causes emotional harm, most marriages are devoid of love, so what harm is there? On the contrary, masturbation can eliminate many marital conflicts, satisfy undeniable physical needs, and thus better maintain the marital relationship and fulfill the responsibilities of both parties. Without extramarital affairs and one-night stands, many couples could grow old together through masturbation. Because marriages destroyed by desire are impenetrable under the protection of masturbation.
I can only say, sigh...
Therefore, I can only vaguely say that social morality is the understanding and perception of morality by the majority of people in society, a comprehensive indicator of the conscience of the majority. Undoubtedly, masturbation violates this indicator, so it's perfectly normal for it to be rejected by the public. Furthermore, even if masturbation doesn't violate fidelity, it still harms the love, or rather, the feelings, between the couple. Because it's difficult for two people who love each other to accept that their partner has sexual relations with another person or several other people.
Morality is a code of conduct, and also a standard for measuring good and evil, beauty and ugliness. When there are too many uncertainties in this standard, it's difficult to use it to measure people's behavior and hearts. As I mentioned earlier, morality is a comprehensive indicator of the conscience of most people in society. However, when the conscience of most people in society is completely corrupted, the question of morality becomes irrelevant.
If most people cannot clearly realize that the foundation of marriage is love and true love, then infidelity is truly justifiable, reasonable, legal, and necessary. Imagine if we happily engaged in infidelity—there would be no issues with mistresses, no checking phone records, no catching someone in bed with another, no suspicion, no secretive behavior, no heartbreak over one-night stands or extramarital affairs, no divorce, no division of property. We could enjoy ourselves to the fullest during infidelity, and when not infidelity, we could get along well and love our children properly. Wouldn't that be wonderful, open and natural?

URL 1:https://www.sexlove5.com/htmlBlog/116362.html

URL 2:/Blog.aspx?id=116362&aspx=1

Last access time:

Previous Page : Training my wife to be a prostitute

Next Page : King's Game that several couples can play together

增加   

comment        Open a new window to view comments